🔗 Share this article

It's Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it appears it’s time for a rethink. Over the years, an observance that started out as a commemorative event of history, culture and the connections between international African diaspora communities, has developed a corporate feel, broadening to incorporate events where individuals of African heritage are compensated to speak with white audiences about “unconscious bias” and active solidarity. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade created a surge in the enterprise of displaying cultural sensitivity. However, that period has concluded. The wave has crested, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what promoting consciousness is for.

The Background of Black History Observance

First commemorated in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was created in 1962 as an observance of African American heritage by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with seven days of commemoration and observance in the February's second week. Black History Month developed from this campaign and was publicly established in 1970. Currently it is marked not only in the North America in the second month, but also in the tenth month in the United Kingdom, the Federal Republic of Germany, Éire and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The observance has evolved since its inception, placing less emphasis on the histories of the slave trade across the Atlantic and struggles for equality, and more on prominent Black figures in politics, culture, and activism, and widely honoring the input Black people have made to shape the country. It is in schools where Black History Month is most regularly observed, with discussions and heritage festivities. But the way the observance is observed is a manifestation of the political moment. How it develops is a instructive case in how co-option leads to erosion: the reshaping of Black History Month has impeded the purpose of it, which is to tackle structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Troubling Time

Few things illustrate how important it is to rethink Black History Month as much as the current time in which it occurs this year. In the UK, a resurgent right in the shape of the Reform party is leading the polls. In the summer we observed the most significant ultra-conservative gathering in British history. the Conservative leader, the person of color at the helm of the Tory party, is a firm opponent of anti-racism activism, and we are in a position where a legislator feels emboldened to state that “not seeing any white faces” in certain urban areas is a cause for alarm. Simultaneously, extreme conservative groups are expanding in the EU as a complete entity.

In the America, a significant offensive against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been brought, often successfully, to the highest courts of the state. A drive to remove Black history and experience from the archives is in progress. One of the political figure's initial presidential directives aimed at the institution dedicated to Black heritage, and the renowned cultural organization, accusing them of a “concerted and widespread effort to rewrite our Nation’s history” by portraying America “as naturally discriminatory”.

Against this backdrop, the month illustrates how insufficiently it can be influential if it is limited to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or stripped of political content commemorations of former accomplishments, rather than addressing the situation of the contemporary world. It also shows how its restricted time span means that it is disconnected from the wider consistent effort that is necessary. A university professor, a professor at University of Greenwich, put it best when she expressed apprehension about the short-term symbolic gestures of the celebration. “The issue with embracing a superficial method”, she stated, “is that it often means that Black History Month evolves into a transient display rather than a agent of progress.”

---

Reconsidering, Not Discarding

Determining how to adjust, modify and expand actions for fair treatment and appreciation in such moments of dejection and worry is a challenging endeavor. There is a inclination to just discontinue things like Black History Month altogether, thinking they are inadequate for current needs, or are relics of an period that has not worked.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and tradition of racial movements – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, DEI programs, and yes, even those talks to businesses – represent an infrastructure that a lot of work has gone into. It is there not just to decay as the politics moves on (and in fact, deteriorates), but to be a vital organism.

So what would a contemporary active Black History Month look like? Firstly, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is distributed throughout the annual calendar (as some institutions are already starting to implement), sections of its curriculum (particularly around prominent figures of color) included in academic syllabi. It would also be a period that does not shy away from governmental matters, and provides room for people, particularly young people, to share their anxieties and narratives. What value has mere awareness of the past when it fails to address the contemporary truth of ultra-nationalist gatherings in the street? Institutions who celebrate it should not be reassured with the neutral terminology of implicit prejudice and alertness to subtle slights, but challenged by the dangers that impact society if anti-racism is not treated with importance. Briefly stated, Black History Month should be made up-to-date, pressing, and reactive. It could be that an complete renaming is in order – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.